The Great Transformation by Georg Rammer, 11/12/2025

The great transformation
Current political developments give us a glimpse of what a dystopian society could look like in just a few years if the erosion of the rule of law and democracy continues.Let’s take an unvarnished look at the reality of the Federal Republic: The federal government and the established parties have run the country into the ground, and a large part of the population feels betrayed, if not threatened, by them; there are few positive prospects in sight. The poll results are devastating for the power elite: trust in political parties and the press seems to have vanished, support for real existing democracy is declining; instead, fear of war, poverty, and brutalization is on the rise. But with a resigned population weary of hypocritical politics, no election, let alone a war, can be won.
by Georg Rammer
[This article posted on 11/12/2025 is translated from the German on the Internet, https://www.manova.news/artikel/der-grosse-umbau.]

In this disastrous situation, let’s put ourselves in the minds of those who have brought about this state of affairs over decades and currently represent it. They want to maintain their power without meeting the needs of the broad majority for peace and social security. So they try to win with populist slogans and a bit of pop psychology, which destroys their politics: trust and confidence.

Vice Chancellor Lars Klingbeil believes that “our main opponent is the mood” in society; Chancellor Friedrich Merz gives a “rallying speech.” Merz, the former BlackRock strategist, who comes across as most honest when he praises the dirty work that Israel does for us, urges us to move forward with confidence and energy!

He seems as if he wants to outdo political satirist Max Uthoff (“Die Anstalt”), who so aptly “does Merz.” Even the conservative, state-supporting press scoffs: “The chancellor attempts a ‘rallying speech’ at a state ceremony.”

So what can be done to halt the loss of confidence and make governing possible in the first place?

The daily horror stories of inflation, housing shortages, a crumbling healthcare system, rising unemployment, the inevitable austerity measures imposed by local authorities on swimming pools, culture, youth work, and the hundreds of billions spent on armament, which means debt for future generations! — yes, they spoil the mood. If one does not want to and cannot change the fundamentals of politics — because then one would lose the support of the economically powerful and the super-rich — the only option is to pervert the meaning of communication and distort the meaning of language with the help of the state-supporting media.

If the federal government were to commission a committee of representatives from the established parties, the secret services, large corporations, and the military to draw up a strategy paper on how to get the population to accept policies that are diametrically opposed to their interests, the result might look something like this:

“I. The situation
For months, we have been observing a highly explosive hybrid threat to our system. Measures for comprehensive war preparedness are being passively endured at best. Plans for a comprehensive reform of our economy in favor of higher yields and profits are being denounced by broad sections of the population as unjust and — as reported by the secret services — as the result of the allegedly existing class society. Efforts by the press and public broadcasters to form a unified society are failing because the media has lost all credibility.

So far, mass unrest has been avoided thanks to reliable, state-loyal media reporting and the rapid response of the security forces. However, the more we are forced to take repressive measures, the more our narrative of the “struggle of liberal democracies against authoritarian regimes” turns against us. In order to at least postpone the declaration of a state of emergency or a national emergency, we consider it essential to modernize our state system in line with existing realities. Since the parties that stabilize the system in the Bundestag can rely on a large majority, a Great Reset of the Basic Law should give our goals retroactive legitimacy.

II. Necessary changes
All Germans who actively contribute to economic growth and are not recognized by the security services as enemies of the free democratic basic order enjoy human dignity.
In order to preserve democracy, fundamental rights must be restricted, in particular the fundamental right to freedom of information and expression, free development of personality, equality before the law and assembly, and the privacy of correspondence. The right to asylum has already been effectively abolished, and the possibility of socialization has never applied.
The peace clause in Article 26 of the Basic Law must be deleted without replacement, as it has long been out of force anyway. In order to maintain peace, war must be prepared for with all necessary means. Contradiction must be made a punishable offense.

Article 20 of the Basic Law (social rule of law) finds its natural limits in the self-regulating laws of a free market economy. Details are regulated by economic experts. Anyone who publicly expresses the terms “class” and “public services” will be prosecuted by the police and the courts as a seditionist.

The UN Charter, international law, and human rights will be replaced by a rule-based order and raison d’état. If a close ally commits war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, or wages a war of annihilation, criticism and resistance must be suppressed with the help of the media and consistent repression. Empathy must be prevented. The Attorney General is prohibited from investigating such crimes.

The elected government is not committed to the will and welfare of the majority of the population, but to the interests of the free economy and its key players.
The free press must support the efforts of the elected federal government to the best of its ability.

The preservation of national security as defined above is the responsibility of the secret services, which work closely with the police and the armed forces on the basis of extensive powers.

We are aware that these plans will provoke criticism and resistance from the usual suspects. Based on previous experience with debt brakes, special funds for the armed forces, asylum law, freedom of assembly, etc., greater resistance should remain manageable through clever and swift repression. All the more so as these proposals merely reflect the existing reality.

The fulfillment of the task of a free press is measured by its contribution to national security, as defined by the government. NATO has set the direction for this, as can be seen, for example, in a lecture given by former NATO spokesman Jamie Shea to representatives from business and administration: “Selling a Conflict — the Ultimate PR Challenge.” One must “explain who is the ‘good guy’ and who is the ‘bad guy.’” And: “If you don’t have a story, make a story.”

In general, we must learn from our closest allies in the US and Israel: We respect fundamental rights and act according to the law where it is possible in the interests of our interests; where it is not, our actions are the law. A necessary war mentality is not created by slavishly promoting law, truth, and justice, but by skillful confusion, psychological destabilization, and, if necessary, repression and violence. We are creating a new reality.“

Attention: This is fiction! — or is it? According to the World Economic Forum, ”The Great Reset” must transform the global economy and global society. According to the Schweizer Handelszeitung, a new world is to be created by 2030, “in which the elites protect a strictly monitored population like shepherds protect their sheep.” Reality needs no malicious satire. The federal government does not implement the will of the people, but ensures approval or at least tolerance of policies in the interests of the power elite. If the analysis of social reality comes to the conclusion that a “class society” prevails, this is pursued by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, regardless of the truth of the matter.

Merz says: “We have been living beyond our means for years.” No, Mr. Merz. This system and its politicians are living beyond our means.